|
Newsletter | Past Issues
November,
2008
In This Issue:
Policy
& Outlook Meetings to be held across Ohio
Agricultural
Tax Schools to be held across Ohio
Thirty
OSUE Agriculture Educators and Specialists trained to
use FINPACK ® Farm Financial Management
Software
Farm
Management Decision Aides Available at OSU Farm Management
Website
Fuel and Fertilizer Prices Remain Volatile
Land Rent Spiral to Slow
Financial
Crisis: Why?
Why
Prices Drop and Where from Here?
Do
you have a question that you would like to ask the Ohio
AG Manager Team? If so, click here to email your
question
Policy
& Outlook Meetings to be held across Ohio
Stan
Ernst, Extension Program Leader & Marketing Instructor,
AED Economics
Eight
regional Policy & Outlook meetings are scheduled
across Ohio during December and January to examine the
state of the farm and food economy. Specialists from
Ohio State University 's Department of Agricultural,
Environmental, and Development Economics provide analysis
and discussion at meetings hosted by local OSU Extension
Educators and industry sponsors. Meetings all include
a meal and require registration. Get in touch with local
contacts for specific locations, program start times,
registration, and costs. This season's lineup of location
contacts, speakers, and topics is as follows:
Dec-2,
lunch – Dutch Valley Restaurant, 1343 Old Rt. 39, Sugar
Creek 44681; Contact: Marissa Mullett, OSU Extension-
Coshocton Co. (740) 622-2265 or Chris Zoller, OSU Extension-
Tuscarawas Co. (888) 398-7175
Grains
& Biofuels Outlook – Matt Roberts
Farm
Policy – Carl Zulauf
Farmland
Values/Rents & Input Costs – Barry Ward
Dairy
Outlook – Cameron Thraen
Food
Prices – Stan Ernst
Dec-4,
dinner – Fairfield County Extension Office, 831 College
Ave., Lancaster 43130-1081; Contact Jim Skeeles, OSU
Extension-Fairfield Co. (740) 653-5419 or Mike Estadt,
OSU Extension-Pickaway Co. (740) 474-7534.
Grains
& Biofuels Outlook – Matt Roberts
Farm
Policy – Carl Zulauf
Farmland
Values/Rents & Input Costs – Barry Ward
General
Economy/Financial Situation – Ian Sheldon
Food
Prices – Stan Ernst
Dec-9,
5:30 pm dinner – St. Paul Lutheran Church, 318 West
Wyandot Ave., Upper Sandusky 43351; Cost $20 prior to
Dec-5. Contact Chris Bruynis, OSU Extension-Wyandot
Co. (419) 294-4931.
Grains
& Biofuels Outlook – Matt Roberts
Farm
Policy – Carl Zulauf
Farmland
Values/Rents & Input Costs – Barry Ward
Food
Prices & Markets – Stan Ernst
Dec-10,
9:30-2 – The Fraternal Order of Eagles, 400 Eastlake
Dr , Ashland 44805-1386 , Contact Chris Willman, John
Augenstein or Valerie Bumb at Sutton Bank (800) 422-3641.
OSU Extension host: Ashland Co. Office (419) 281-8242.
Cost: $18 or free if you RSVP to Sutton Bank by Dec.
4 and attend as their guest.
Grains
& Biofuels Outlook – Matt Roberts
Farm
Policy – Carl Zulauf
Farmland
Values/Rents & Input Costs – Barry Ward
Dairy
Outlook – Cameron Thraen
Food
Prices – Stan Ernst
Dec-10,
4-8:30pm – Attica Fairgrounds Social Hall, 15131 E.
Twp. Rd. 12, Attica 44807. Contact Chris Willman, John
Augenstein or Valerie Bumb at Sutton Bank (800) 422-3641.
OSU Extension host: Ed Lentz, OSU Extension-Seneca Co.
(419) 447-9722. Cost: $18 or free if you RSVP to Sutton
Bank by Dec. 4 and attend as their guest.
Grains
& Biofuels Outlook – Matt Roberts
Farm
Policy – Carl Zulauf
Farmland
Values/Rents & Input Costs – Barry Ward
Food
Prices & Markets – Stan Ernst
Dec-
11,lunch; – Shelby Co. OSU Extension Office, Sidney;
Contact Roger Bender, OSU Extension-Shelby Co. (937)
498-7239.
Grains
& Biofuels Outlook – Matt Roberts
Farm
Policy – Carl Zulauf
Farmland
Values/Rents & Input Costs – Barry Ward
General
Economy/Financial Situation – Ian Sheldon
Food
Prices – Stan Ernst
Dec-11,
dinner – Apollo Career Center, 3325 Shawnee Rd., Lima
45806-1497; Contact Curtis Young, OSU Extension-Allen
Co. (419) 222-9946.
Grains
& Biofuels Outlook – Matt Roberts
Farm
Policy – Carl Zulauf
Farmland
Values/Rents & Input Costs – Barry Ward
General
Economy/Financial Situation – Ian Sheldon
Food
Prices – Stan Ernst
Jan-29,
2009, dinner – Der Dutchman Restaurant, 445 S Jefferson
Ave., Plain City 43064; Contact Eric Imerman, OSU Extension-Madison
Co. 740-852-0975
Grains
& Biofuels Outlook – Matt Roberts
Farm
Policy – Carl Zulauf
Farmland
Values/Rents & Input Costs – Barry Ward
Food
Prices & Markets – Stan Ernst
More
information on OSU's Policy & Outlook program is
online at http://aede.osu.edu/programs/outlook
.
Return
to Top
Agricultural
Tax Schools to be held across Ohio
David
Marrison, OSU Extension, Ashtabula County
Tax
practitioners with an interest in farm income taxes
will have an opportunity to attend a one day farm tax
workshop scheduled for December 15 from 9:30 a.m. to
4:00 p.m. in nine locations across Ohio. The workshop
will be held on Monday, December 15 th at the following
locations in Ohio: Caldwell, Chillicothe, Columbus,
Greenville, Jefferson, Ottawa, Urbana, Upper Sandusky
and Wooster.
These
workshops will be taught by Dr. Phil Harris, Professor
of Agricultural Economics from the University of Wisconsin.
Participants will hear a lecture on current agricultural
tax issues given by Dr. Harris supplemented with a slide
presentation. Dr. Harris will be available for questions
during two scheduled conference calls and OSU faculty
will also be available to answer questions on-site.
Participants will also receive a 300 page book, Agricultural
Tax Issues and Form Preparation, authored by Dr. Harris
as part of their registration.
Topics
to be covered during the workshop include tax provisions
of the 2008 Farm Bill, sale of carbon credits, conservation
easements & the farmer provisions, prepaid expenses,
fertilizer containment structures, soil & water
conservation payments, tax issues for farmland owners
who rent their land, depreciation & IRC 179 expensing
and other related topics.
The
Agricultural Tax Issues program has been accepted for
continuing education credits by the Accountancy Board
of Ohio, IRS Director of Practice and the Ohio Supreme
Court Commission on Continuing Legal Education. Workshop
information, a downloadable registration form as well
as on-line registration are available at the following
website: http://incometaxschools.osu.edu
. Or contact Dr. Warren Lee, Ohio Income Tax Schools,
at 614-292-6308 for additional information concerning
the workshop. The Agricultural Tax Issues Workshop is
sponsored by the Ohio State University Department of
Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics
and Ohio State University Extension.
Return
to Top
Thirty
OSUE Agriculture Educators and Specialists trained to
use FINPACK ® Farm Financial Management Software
Dianne
Shoemaker, Extension Dairy Specialist, the Ohio State
University Extension shoemaker.3@osu.edu
Where
are we, where do we want to go, how can we get there?
Critical questions for farm businesses in all stages
of growth; new, expanding, consolidating, exiting, or
transferring to the next generation. Important questions
are not always easily or quickly answered. From a farm
business perspective, the FINPACK ® financial planning
and analysis software is a top-notch tool to help farm
businesses of all types analyze and answer these questions.
Thirty
Agriculture Educators and Specialists gathered for training
on the newest release of the FINPACK program at the
Ohio State University in Columbus in October. Designed
and supported by the Center for Farm Financial Management
at the University of Minnesota, FINPACK has been used
by OSU Extension to help Ohio farms for 25 years.
Training
focused on the FINAN financial analysis program, and
FINLRB, a financial long-range budgeting program. Using
FINAN with enterprise analysis, a farm business can
analyze their business year and determine which crop
(agronomic or horticultural) and/or livestock
enterprises were profitable and which were not. It also
analyzes the profitability of the total farm business.
Profitability measures for the farm are graphically
compared to Farm Financial Standards Council guidelines.
FINLRB
allows a farm business to look at the “what ifs?” On
paper, the farm can look at multiple ways of changing
the business such as an expansion, changing enterprises.
bringing in a family member, buying out a partner, making
a major capital investment, etc. FINLRB allows you to
look at any changes, evaluate profitability and compare
them to the way things currently are before
money is invested or ground is broken.
When
an alternative is developed that meets the objectives
of the farm business, two additional FINPACK programs
can help complete the planning process. FINFLO generates
annual, quarterly or monthly cash flow projections.
Then, FINLRB and FINFLO results can be imported into
the BUSINESS PLAN software. This user-friendly package
then guides the farm through the additional non-financial
sections needed in a complete business plan.
These
OSU Educators and Specialists are available to work
with farm businesses interested in learning more about
and using these financial management tools. Look for
your County Extension Educator or one in a county near
you in the contact list that follows. Cost to a farm
business for a FINLRB or FINAN is $100. Additional information
about FINPACK can be reviewed at the Center for Farm
Financial Management's website: http://www.cffm.umn.edu
Name
|
County
|
Phone
|
Email
address |
Glen
Arnold |
Putnam
|
419-523-6294
|
arnold.2@osu.edu
|
Maureen
Austin |
Stark
|
330-830-7700
|
austin.238@osu.edu
|
John
Barker |
Knox
|
740-397-0401
|
barker.41@osu.edu
|
Steve
Bartels |
Butler
|
513-887-3722
|
bartels.2@osu.edu
|
Florian
Chirra |
Williams
|
419-636-5608
|
chirra.1@cfaes.osu.edu
|
Bruce
Clevenger |
Defiance
|
419-782-4771
|
clevenger.10@osu.edu
|
Stan
Ernst |
Columbus
|
614-292-6421
|
ernst.1@osu.edu
|
Mike
Estadt |
Pickaway
|
740-474-7534
|
estadt.3@osu.edu
|
Steve
Foster |
Darke
|
937-548-5215
|
foster.99@osu.edu
|
Mike
Gastier |
Huron
|
419-668-8219
|
gastier.3@osu.edu
|
Wes
Haun |
Logan
|
937-595-4227
|
haun.17@osu.edu
|
Jonah
Johnson |
Clark
|
937-328-4607
|
johnson.3225@cfaes.osu.edu
|
Rory
Lewandowski |
Athens
|
740-593-8555
|
lewandowski.11@osu.edu
|
Jim
Lopshire |
Paulding
|
419-399-8225
|
lopshire.1@osu.edu
|
David
Marrison |
Ashtabula
|
440-576-9008
|
marrison.2@osu.edu
|
Gene
McCluer |
Hardin
|
419-674-2297
|
mccluer.1@cfaes.osu.edu
|
Mark
Mechling |
Muskingum
|
740-454-0144
|
mechling.1@osu.edu
|
Tony
Nye |
Clinton
|
937-382-4995
|
nye.1@osu.edu
|
Steve
Prochaska |
Crawford
|
419-562-8731
|
prochaska.1@osu.edu
|
Rich
Sherman |
Scioto
|
740-354-7879
|
sherman.76@osu.edu
|
Dianne
Shoemaker |
Wooster
|
330-257-3377
|
shoemaker.3@osu.edu
|
Cam
Thraen |
Columbus
|
614-292-2707
|
thraen.1@osu.edu
|
Barry
Ward |
Columbus
|
614-688-3959
|
ward.8@osu.edu
|
Gary
Wilson |
Hancock
|
419-422-3851
|
wilson.26@osu.edu
|
Ted
Wiseman |
Perry
|
740-743-1602
|
wiseman.15@osu.edu
|
John
Yost |
Fayette
|
740-335-1150
|
yost.77@osu.edu
|
Return
to Top
Farm
Management Decision Aides Available at OSU Farm Management
Website
By
Brian Freytag, OSU Extension Intern, Undergraduate Student
Barry Ward, Leader, Production Business Management
Custom
Rate Calculator
The
Custom Rate Calculator calculates potential alternative
current Custom Rates based on the increase or decrease
in fuel prices. By inputting the current cost
of farmgate diesel, users can calculate a current custom
rate that they may consider as an alternative to custom
rates published in the OSU Extension Factsheet, “Ohio
Farm Custom Rates -2008” available at: http://ohioline.osu.edu/ae-fact/pdf/Custom_Rates_08.pdf
Machinery
Rental Rates Calculator
This
decision aid enables you to calculate the rental value
of machinery based on a current custom rate charge (including
labor, fuel, and tractor). Users input the current custom
rate for the implement (and tractor if needed) and the
percent of custom charge (default values are given).
These inputs will yield a machinery rental rate which
can be used for farmer to farmer rental negotiations
or to evaluate a rental from a dealer. Users can also
calculate implement rental rates without tractor. This
decision aid as well as other farm management decision
aids are available to download at:
http://aede.osu.edu/Programs/FarmManagement/Budgets/download.htm
Crop
Share Calculator
Do
you have a crop share lease and are interested in the
best way to organize the lease so that it is fair for
both the landowner and the tenant? The OSU Extension
Crop Share Calculator will help you do this. This
decision aide will help you to organize lease shares
and will assist in calculating the total receipts and
expenses that the landowner and tenant will share. This
calculator is separated into three different sections
by spreadsheet page. The first is the “Shares” page
which allows the user to input the percentage of various
receipts and costs that the landowner will be responsible
for. The decision aid will then automatically calculate
the percentage the tenant is responsible for. The second
page is the “Costs” page, where the user will input
receipt and expense raw data. These receipts include
Yield, Price, and Government payments. Costs include
land, machinery, labor, management, and direct cash
costs. The “Calculation” page displays the total receipts
and costs to both the tenant and the landowner.
Value
of Manure Worksheet
This
worksheet displays default values for amounts of nitrogen,
phosphorus and potassium in various livestock manures
and assists the user in calculating a value per ton
or per acre applied. Users input current fertilizer
prices to calculate the value of the livestock manure
per ton or per acre applied. Users can also adjust N,P
and K levels for the livestock manures included in the
worksheet to calculate a more representative value for
the manures they plan to use.
The
Value of Manure Worksheet was created by John
Rausch, Extension Program Director, Animal Manure Management
and Amanda Meddles, Program Coordinator, Environmental
Management in coordination with Brian Freytag and Barry
Ward.
Flexible
Cash Lease Calculator
The
Flexible Cash Lease Calculator determines the rental
rate of land using several price flexing methods. This
tool will be described in more detail in a separate
article.
These
decision aides are now available at the OSU Farm Management
website at:
http://aede.osu.edu/Programs/FarmManagement/Budgets/download.htm
These
decision aides require Microsoft Excel to use. Alternatively,
if you do not have Microsoft Excel, you can download
and use OpenOffice.org for free. This is an Open Source
alternative to Microsoft Excel. OpenOffice.org can be
downloaded at http://www.openoffice.org.
Return
to Top
Fuel
and Fertilizer Prices Remain Volatile
by Brian Freytag, Extension
Intern, Undergraduate Student
Barry Ward, Leader, Production Business Management
The
last time we reported on the cost of fertilizer and
diesel, we reported that even while diesel prices were
decreasing, the cost of fertilizer continued its upward
trend. As diesel prices continue to fall following oil
price declines, fertilizer prices have leveled off and
in some cases begun to decrease.
The
US average price of On-Highway diesel, as reported by
the Energy Information Administration, was $3.288 per
gallon on October 27, 2008 http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/wohdp/diesel.asp
. This is a decrease of 10% from two weeks ago and
a 21% decrease from 6 months ago.
Fertilizer
prices, in general, have leveled off. As of 10/21/2008,
NH3 was $1170 per ton, which is down 3.44% from two
weeks ago ($1212 per ton), but up 23% from three months
ago ($1053 per ton). UAN is down 2% from two weeks ago,
from $492 to $482.75 per ton. Urea decreased the most
among nitrogen fertilizer, falling from $827.75 to $572.5
per ton in a two week period. This is a decrease of
nearly 31%. This new price of Urea is 22.19% lower than
it was 3 months ago.
MAP
and DAP as of 10/21/2008 were both decreasing, but have
not dropped below the $1000 per ton mark. MAP went from
$1225 to $1120 per ton in the last two weeks, while
DAP decreased from $1218 to $1172 per ton. These are
decreases of 8.75% and 3.80% respectively.
As
of 10/21/2008 Potash and 10-34-0 have not followed this
trend. According to our survey, the average price of
Potash is $934 per ton. This is up 6.59% from two weeks
ago. Likewise, 10-34-0 has increased from $1037.5 to
$1110 per ton, an increase of 6.99%.
As
of 10/27/2008:
On-Highway
Diesel - $3.288 per gallon
As
of 10/21/2008:
NH3
- $1170/ton or $0.713/lb
UAN - $482/ton or $0.861/lb
UAN-Direct to farm - $449/ton or $0.802/lb
Urea - $572.5/ton or $0.622/lb
MAP - $1120/ton or $1.0769/lb
DAP - $1172/ton or $1.2739/lb
Potash - $934/ton or $0.778/lb
10-34-0 - $1110/ton or $1.632/lb
Return
to Top
Land
Rent Spiral to Slow
Jim
Skeeles, OSU Extension Educator, Fairfield and Hocking
Counties
Summarized
from “2009 Rental Decisions Given Volatile Commodity
Prices and Higher Input Costs” by Gary Schnitkey and
Dale Lattz, University of Illinois
at Urbana-Champaign in
“Illinois
Farm Economics Update” http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/IFEU/IFEU_08_05/IFEU_08_05.html
Many
farmers and landlords are now setting crop land rental
rates for 2009. With the current lower crop prices cash
rent prices will certainly level and in some instances
may even decrease. The authors referenced say, “……..If
the cash rent must be set now, realize that the fundamentals
of prices and costs suggest lower cash rent bids then
what would have been established just a few months ago
and what would have been justified by 2007 and 2008
returns…….”
The
authors also had the following to say about crop price
projection on October 15 th : “Besides declining, there
is a great deal of price uncertainty. Bid prices on
options contracts can be used to gauge price uncertainty.
On October 8th, options contracts implied that there
was a 33 percent chance that the December 2009 futures
contract would be below $3.53 per bushel in December
2009. There also was a 33 percent probability of a price
above $5.06 per bushel. Much of the focus currently
is on the possibility of low prices. There is, however,
a significant chance of relatively high prices.
Not
only have crop prices gyrated wildly recently, the costs
of producing a crop have dramatically increased. These
put together have resulted in a dramatic increase in
farmer risk. The authors had the following to say about
Illinois risk, which has the same relationship for Ohio
farmers: “Between 2000 and 2006, the farmer margin (i.e.,
operator and farmland return – cash rent) averaged about
$50 per acre in Illinois. Since 2006, risks have increased
greatly. For farmers to have the same risk post-2006
as existed at a $50 cash rent pre-2006, it was estimated
that the farmer margin needs to increase to $135 per
acre.”
At
a $135 farmer margin theoretically there is no money
left over to pay crop land rent with $4.20 corn price
and a $9.50 soybean price. Subtracting $135 farmer margin
from operator and farmland returns for the southern
region of Illinois with 146 bushel per acre corn yield
leaves no money left over for rent payment. For Ohio
ground expected to yield less than 146 bushel per acre
there is a loss even without paying cash rent.
The
above dilemma inherently means that farmers are and
will be assuming more risk than previously. Only those
farmers willing to carry the most risk will be the aggressive
bidders for crop ground. Therefore, the authors of the
referenced article “argue(s) for flexibility in leasing
arrangements offered by variable cash or share rent
arrangements.” and continue their article discussing
how to flex leases. They conclude their article as follows:
“Currently, there is a great deal of price uncertainty.
This is causing difficulties is setting cash rents.
We suggest using share rent or variable cash rent arrangements.
If a fixed cash rent arrangement must be used, we suggest
waiting in setting the cash rent level. Cash rent agreements
set at relatively high levels may need to be re-negotiated.”
Return
to Top
Financial
Crisis: Why?
Jim
Skeeles, OSU Educator, Fairfield and Hocking Counties
Quotes
and Summary of Illinois Farm Economics Update, Nick
Peterson, U. of Illinois http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/IFEU/IFEU_08_01/IFEU_08_01.html
“The
simplest and most direct answer to how we got here is
that, over the past few years, too many “bad” mortgage
loans were made in the U.S………From 1995 to 2007, total
mortgage debt in the U.S. increased from $3.5 trillion
to more than $11 trillion ( Hamilton , 2008).”
Just
like I get tired of hearing “maverick” and “fundamental
difference” from our politicians, I get tired of hearing
“toxic loans” from the media. How did all these bad
or toxic loans all of a sudden occur? Our present dilemma
is due to our success. We created Freddie and Fannie
to increase the flow of money into mortgages to improve
the economy and encourage especially first time, low
income and those customers considered high risk to purchase
a home. Freddie, Fannie and the mortgage market of today
have allowed mortgages to be packaged and sold on a
competitive market. Those applying for a mortgage could
deal with their local bank, but increasingly have dealt
with a broker who shopped the market for a loan with
lower monthly payments and lower down payment, at least
initially.
Freddie
and Fannie allow for pooling a large number of uniformly
written mortgages and selling them on the open market.
The investor buys this pool of mortgages in return for
the future stream of payments and the right to acquire
the home or property if the payment isn't made. The
previous backing of equity required of savings and loans
and banks is no longer guaranteed, at least not at previous
levels.
Further,
as mortgages have been packaged and sold, commissions
granted to mortgage brokers have become substantial.
Brokers whose income is driven by the number of mortgages
written and packaged have sold more and more mortgages,
without any risk if the mortgage cannot be repaid. Increased
investment in the packaged and pooled mortgage market
has been driven by the rising market, fueled just as
Wall Street is fueled by expectation of a continued
rising market.
“Additionally,
the rapid increase in real-estate values provided justification
for lending amounts in excess of market values without
down payment requirements and/or documented proof of
repayment ability. Originating lenders were more than
willing to approve loans to even the riskiest borrowers
because they never intended to personally finance and
take on the risk of the mortgages.” They intended to
sell the mortgage and future risk to the buyer of the
mortgage-backed security.
New
types of mortgages have allowed lower initial payments
with lower down payments. ARM means adjustable rate
mortgage. ARM's usually have a lower interest rate than
fixed rate, where the interest rate stays the same for
the duration of the mortgage. With an ARM if the interest
rate goes up either the payment goes up or the equity
in the home builds slower if the home value goes up
or drops faster when home values drop, which has happened
for many homes now. Another “bad boy” in especially
the sup-prime (toxic) mortgages is the balloon payment.
A balloon payment means one has lower payments initially
(often not even covering interest that accrues), but
at the end or sometime during the mortgage a lump sum
substantial payment is demanded to keep the mortgage
current.
Along
with the leveling or decline in home values and increased
default rate ”the value of mortgage based securities
has plummeted.” Thus, investors quit buying mortgages
and won't even invest in other debt-based instruments.
Investment institutions with assets of future income
streams such as mortgages and loans have become insolvent
and even solvent lenders can't get the financing needed
to make new loans or mortgages.
References
Barnes,
R. 2008. “The Fuel that Fed the Subprime Meltdown.”
[ http://www.investopedia.com/articles/07/subprime-overview.asp?Page=1
]
Hamilton,
J.D. 2008 “How We Got Here.”
[ http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2008/10/Hamilton_Rady.ppt
]
Return
to Top
Why
Prices Drop and Where from Here?
Jim
Skeeles, OSU Extension Educator, Fairfield and Hocking
Counties
Summarized
from “ Implications of Credit Market
Problems for Crop Prices” in “Illinois Farm Economics
Update” by Darrel Good and Scott Irwin ,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/IFEU/IFEU_08_03/IFEU_08_03.html
The
usual indicators for crop prices such as a projected
larger than expected crop, record harvests outside the
U.S. and larger than expected inventories. For livestock
factors include continuing record production and weakening
of export demand. “Price
declines since early September, however, have coincided
with the severe problems in U.S. and global credit markets.
Is the timing of the price declines and credit problems
a matter of coincidence or is there a cause and effect
relationship in these markets?”
The
answer is that with all these gloomy projections in
the U.S., the projected demand for agricultural products
in down, including food, biofuels, livestock products
and livestock feed. All else equal, lower demand equals
lower prices.
So
if in a recession, how long, how bad and how much inpact
on our prices? Good and Irwin point out that “Beginning
with the “Great Depression” of 1929 to 1933, there have
been 13 recessionary periods in the U.S. economy. Typically,
a decline in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is associated
with a recessionary period, although revised GDP data
for 2001 indicate that there was actually small growth
in the GDP that year. The 10 Post-World War II recessions
have varied in length from 6 months (1980) to 16 months
(1973-75 and 1981-82). The average length of the 10
periods of contraction was 10 months. The peak-to-trough
changes in the domestic GDP ranged from +0.3 percent
to -3.2 percent and averaged -1.6 percent.
“If
the current economic downturn is of average duration
and severity, it would be expected to extend into the
spring of 2009 and result in a 1.5 to 2.0 percent decline
in domestic GDP. If the downturn equals the most severe
since World War II, it would be expected to extend through
all of 2009 and result in a 3.0 to 3.5 percent decline
in the domestic GDP. Early indications are that the
current downturn might be in the latter category.
Agricultural
prices do not behave consistently during recessionary
periods since those prices are influenced by a wide
range of factors. The years of 1973 and 1974, for example,
were characterized by relatively high rates of inflation
and significant shortfalls in crop production in the
U.S. and around the world. In fact, 1973 marked the
beginning of a structural shift to a new higher level
of nominal prices for crop and livestock commodities
(see Good and Irwin, 2008). In contrast, the period
of 1981 and 1982 was characterized by large U.S. and
world crops, relatively strong domestic and export demand
and crop and livestock prices that could be characterized
as average or normal.
“To
some extent, the agricultural economy is a bit more
“recession-proof” than the general economy because of
the importance of the export market and because food
expenditures are not as discretionary as most other
expenditures. Still, poor performance in the U.S. and
world economy will tend to reduce the demand for agricultural
products………For crops, the answer likely centers around
the value of corn since it is consumed in large quantities
in both the fuel and feed sectors…..”
“In
the current environment, the value of corn to produce
ethanol is in the upper $3.00 to mid $4.00 range. Where
will crude oil and unleaded gasoline prices be in 2009?
A recovery from the current financial and stock market
meltdown might suggest crude oil prices near $100 per
barrel and unleaded gasoline near $2.38. Under that
scenario, ethanol would be valued near $2.05 per gallon
and corn would be valued in the range of $5.00 to $5.80.
A continuation of an economic slowdown and crude oil
prices near $70 per barrel puts corn values in the $3.00
to $4.00 range.”
As
an example in the livestock sector, to cover only variable
costs with assumptions in the article, farrow-to-finish
operators in Iowa “could afford to pay $6.21 for corn
to feed hogs from October 2008 through March 2009. To
cover all costs, the breakeven price is only $4.42 per
bushel.
“Based
on current market prices for crude oil and hogs, the
value of corn is likely in the low to mid $4.00 range.
Assuming a value of $4.00 and a soybean to corn price
ratio of 2.3 to 1, soybeans would have a value of about
$9.20 per bushel. Similarly, a wheat to corn price ratio
of 1.26 to 1 would point to a soft red winter wheat
value near $5.00 per bushel………..”
“The
apparent over-reaction of crop prices to the downturn
in financial markets suggests that at least a modest
recovery in prices can be expected in the post-harvest
period. The timing and magnitude of such a recovery
will be heavily influenced by the confidence the market
shows in a stabilization of the financial markets and
the depth and duration of the domestic and global economic
slowdown. While ownership of corn and soybean crops
is expensive, prospects for a price recovery suggests
storing a substantial portion of the crop that has not
yet been priced, particularly if on-farm storage is
available.”
“Longer
term, corn and soybean producers will have to make decisions
relative to acreage allocation in 2009. Current projections
of use and carryover stocks for the 2008-09 marketing
year suggest that nationally there will be a need to
shift 3 to 4 million acres from soybeans to corn. Relative
prices will have to motivate that shift, implying a
price ratio that favors corn production.”
References
Good,
D., and S. Irwin. “The New Era of Corn, Soybean, and
Wheat Prices.” Marketing and Outlook Brief 08-04, Department
of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, September 2008.
[ http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/marketing/mobr/mobr_08-04/mobr_08-04.pdf
]
Ellis,
S., W. Edwards, J. Lawrence, and A. Johanns. “Livestock
Enterprise Budgets for Iowa-2008.” FM 1815, Iowa State
University Extension, March 2008.
[ http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/FM1815.pdf
]
Schnitkey,
G. “Drying and Storage Costs in 2008: Comparing Alternatives
with the Grain Delivery Model
.” Farm Economics Facts and
Opinions 08-15, Department of Agricultural and Consumer
Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
September 27, 2008.
[ http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/manage/newsletters/fefo08_15/fefo08_15.pdf
Return
to Top
**************************************************************************************
Readers
can subscribe electronically to this newsletter by sending
an e-mail message to: ohioagmanager-on@ag.osu.edu.
A successful subscription message will receive by an
automatic reply from the listserv. Contact your local
Ohio State University Extension Office or e-mail marrison.2@osu.edu
if you have problems subscribing.
The
Ohio Ag Manager newsletter is published in collaboration
by OSU Extension Educators and Faculty members of Ohio
State University's Department of Agricultural, Environmental
and Development Economics.
Ohio
Ag Manager Team Leaders: Chris Bruynis & David Marrison
Web
Page Managers: David Marrison & Andy Kleinschmidt
Information
presented above and where trade names are used, they
are supplied with the understanding that no discrimination
is intended and no endorsement by Ohio State University
Extension is implied.
Ohio
State University Extension embraces human diversity
and is committed to ensuring that all research and related
educational programs are available to clientele on a
nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color,
religion, sex, age, national origin, sexual orientation,
gender identity or expression, disability, or veteran
status. This statement is in accordance with United
States Civil Rights Laws and the USDA.
Keith
L. Smith, Ph.D., Associate Vice President for Agricultural
Administration and Director, Ohio State University Extension
TDD No. 800-589-8292 ( Ohio only) or 614-292-1868
|